Case Study / Product UX Lead

BNY Mellon
Pershing X
Advisory

Zack GortUX Lead / Product Owner
AgencyPublicis Sapient
ClientBNY Mellon — Pershing
PlatformAdvisor & Wealth Management UX
Scroll

The Role & the Mission

As the designated Product Owner and UX Lead, Zack Gort partnered closely with key stakeholders at BNY Mellon and Publicis Sapient, workshopping and interfacing directly with clients, facilitating UX workshops and design leadership across a fast-moving multi-track project pipeline.

The engagement centered on redesigning the Pershing X Advisory Experience — a complex financial advisory platform used by wealth managers and advisors to plan, propose, and manage client portfolios.

Zack managed timelines and expectations while providing guidance and mentorship to junior and associate UX designers across three parallel workstreams.

Product Owner bridging agency & client leadership
Led UX across multiple fast-moving pipelines
Mentored Jr./Assoc. UX designers on the team
Reported to Program Director; partnered with VP Experience & VP Technology
Agency and Client Leadership Org Chart

How I Work

Three interlocking competency areas define the approach Zack brought to the engagement — from strategic research grounding to hands-on production and systemic innovation.

1

Learning & Research

Strategic UX ideation and diligence supporting clients' objectives — leveraging informed best-practice and proven methodologies towards resolution. Working with data and insights from product & industry experts in alignment with project management and cross-disciplinary teams.

2

Making & Doing

Expert in Information Architecture; crafting data-backed design systems to accommodate fluctuating taxonomy and content strategies. Customer journey mapping and distillation of complex, dynamic subjects through multi-variate project pipelines.

3

Innovating

Active proponent for foundational and accessible design, approached in partnership with developers. Innovation stems from collective need, not individual desire — it's through team effort, not personal hubris, that the most productive means to fulfillment are found.

Competencies slide detail

Know the Product. Know the User.

Phase 1

Product Audit

Zack conducted a holistic inventory of the existing Pershing X platform — distilling architecture, user and system flows, and industry-specific jargon. Every screen state, table pattern, modal, and navigation instance was catalogued to build a complete baseline understanding before any redesign work began.

Understand the product as it exists today
Come to understand the product's needs
Wayfind through objective observations (data)
Wayfind with empathy (data insights)
Phase 2

Heuristic Analysis

With the product documented, Zack applied heuristic analysis to identify critical UX pain points — the crux issues that transformative thinking often runs into due to legacy practices, budgetary constraints, or cross-organizational bottlenecks. Rather than cataloguing problems, this phase was about identifying a palette of viable ways forward.

Heuristic analysis — user learned behavior
Phase 3

Support & Knowledge Building

As product owner and team lead, Zack conducted hands-on analysis and wayfinding — providing research findings, socializing relevant industry knowledge, and invoking NNG-guided UX ethos. He provided his team with a foundational "thought template" to ensure everyone was applying consistent, fundamentally sound design thinking.

Support and research deliverables

Use Cases & Conceptual POV

Partnering with industry and product experts, Zack defined use-case scenarios from which the forward plan of attack would be formulated. This was a highly involved process engaging all levels of agency and client stakeholders and contributors.

Three primary use cases were defined, covering Pershing Account / Managed / Existing Client / New type account flows — spanning single and multi-account scenarios, external custodial accounts, and onboarding new clients.

Exploring with empathy
Use-case scenarios grounded in real advisor workflows
Involved all levels of stakeholders in the process
Use Case flow diagrams
Don't attach yourself to a particular outcome. Allow yourself to be wrong. Have the humility to keep asking questions.
— Zack Gort, on the collaboration mindset
01 · Core Flow
Opening a Managed Account
5-phase workflow for the managed account setup process. Use case: Pershing Account, Managed, Existing Client.
Flow Doc
Phase 05
Deliverables
Core managed account opening flow — 5-phase UX spec for the primary use case
01Overview & Key Information
The client onboarding log ties to BNY Mellon's Portfolio Centers as an account once it has been opened. Key data pulled from FAs' existing client records.
Overview Screen
Key Info
FA Context
02Opening a Managed Account
Navigate to: /ClientOnboarding/OpeningManaged/<ClientID>
Client List
Select Client
Open Managed Acct
Form: Basic Details
Managed Details
After Add Managed Details — navigate to Button and proceed to CustodianFull.
03Proposal or Investment Type Selection
Proposal Start
type?
UMA
SMA
MF
ETF
Managed
5 investment type branches from single decision point
04Adding the Investment Details
Model Selection
UMA Details
SMA Details
Investment type governs which detail fields appear. UMA has expanded options. SMA has fewer required fields.
05Adding Managed Account Attributes
9-step attribute collection sequence with branching based on custodian, account type, and proposal:
Custodian Setup / Account Type
Investment Proposal Type
Select UMA / SMA Type
New Funding Source
Select Trading Group
Name the Account
Duplicate Acct Alert
SMA Sleeve Options
Summary Screen
Collaborate, Corroborate, Correlate — Landing Page terminology work

Collaborate. Corroborate. Correlate.

A macro-level view of the direct collaboration with the client — in this case, working with a UX copywriter to define best use-case vernacular and provide an intuitively aligned user experience. V0 and V1 terminology lists were iterated in tandem with actual screen designs to validate language decisions.

Deep client collaboration on terminology & UX copy
Iterated vocabulary alongside UI development
Grounded decisions in provably intuitive language

Deliverables

From initial concept sketches to fully-specified design systems, the work spanned every layer of the product — information architecture, user flows, navigation systems, and component libraries.

Ground-Up, Modular & Atomic

The design system was built from the ground up as a fully modular, atomic-based library — covering table build overviews, header types, data cell components, form fields, dropdowns, toggles, buttons, and radio controls.

Color theory and accessibility prioritization were baked in from the start, with functional UX specifications documented for handoff to development. The guiding principle: build it well, document it clearly, but don't marry it.

Fully atomic, modular component architecture
Color theory & WCAG accessibility compliance
Functional UX specifications for dev handoff
Designed to flex with evolving content strategy
Design system pages in Figma
Current and proposed account opening flows

Information Architecture Mastery

Zack's specialty is information architecture, navigation schemas, and crafting data-backed user and data flows. This holistic POV provided a greater, complete view of the total product — enabling him to shape both the user and visual experience cohesively, from the highest system level down to individual interaction states.

Deliverables included both current-state documentation and newly proposed account opening flows, comparing the existing process against a streamlined, multi-account capable redesign.

Phase 04
Direction
Lift curve concept — manual entry vs preload cognitive effort; core argument for preloading
12 · Concept

Lift Diagrams

Cognitive effort curves across the account opening workflow — manual entry vs. preloaded data. Each step plotted against user input burden, decision friction, and wait time.

11Manual entry steps
4Preload confirm steps
~64%Effort reduction
Manual entry
User supplies all data from scratch at each step
Entrystart
Client IDlookup
KYCverify
Agreementgate
EDTdata
Doc Reviewwait
MA Detailsform
Proposalbranch
Attributes9 fields
Nameinput
Submitend
Preload flow
System pre-populates; user confirms or edits deliberately
Preloadsystem
Who for?confirm
Gatebranch
Short Formconfirm
Gatecheck
MA Attrsconfirm
Submitend
Overlay comparison
Normalized effort across the full workflow — the shaded gap represents total lift reduction
Manual entry
Preload flow
Manual entry — high sustained liftUser bears full cognitive load at task start and throughout. Input burden is continuous — 11 active entry points, multiple decision gates, no data inheritance between steps. Aggregate lift remains elevated through completion.
Preload — low aggregate liftSystem performs the heavy lifting upfront. User effort appears only at deliberate confirm or edit moments — 4 light-touch interactions vs. 11 data entry tasks. Aggregate load drops ~64%.
14 · Proposal
Current vs. Proposed Account Opening Flow
Side-by-side comparison of the existing flow architecture against the redesign. Includes lift curve evidence for the preload argument.
Proposal
Phase 05
Deliverables
Current vs proposed account opening flow — the core redesign proposal with lift curve evidence
Current Account Opening Flow
Use case 1: Pershing Acct, Managed, Existing Client
Entry
Client ID
Agreement
Fail
KYC
EDT
Doc Review
MA Details
Attributes
Submit
Current: high cognitive load, multiple branches, no preload capability
NEW Proposed Account Opening Flow
Use case: Opening Acct, Managed. Ability to open multiple account types at once.
Preload Client
Who is this for?
Short Form
MA Attributes
Submit
Proposed: preloaded data, conversational entry, fewer decision points, multi-account capable
IA specialty in action: Zack's approach to information architecture meant both current-state documentation and newly proposed flows were produced — giving stakeholders a complete before/after view at the system level, from highest architecture down to individual interaction states.
Lift Curve Comparison
Manual entry
Preload flow
Manual entry effort is high and sustained. Preload effort stays near baseline with small spikes at confirm points.
Manual entry: high lift from step one — 11 data inputs, multiple decision gates, no inheritance.
Preload: near-zero lift throughout — 4 confirm moments vs. 11 entry tasks. ~64% effort reduction.

Team Leader. Supporter. Cheerleader.

Zack showed up to the office every day. He committed to being a reliable partner, teammate, and resource to all he worked with. Through this approach, he fostered an engaging and productive team dynamic built on trust and transparency.

Leadership wasn't exercised top-down — it was embodied daily through physical presence, radical transparency in communication, and a genuine investment in the growth and success of every team member.

Camera on. Unmuted. Present — in office and on calls
T-shaped leadership style for maximum team inclusion
Enabler, promoter, and team cheerleader
Transparency as a tool for productivity and trust
I endeavor to set my team up for success
Whiteboard session — roles and responsibilities Duty and Diligence — team communication and collaboration
Camera on, unmuted, present — screenshot of active team collaboration
I'm an enabler; a promoter; a team cheerleader. I ask a lot of questions; I get all the answers. I get a [sh*t ton] done.
— Zack Gort

Continuous Improvement

Kaizen — a Japanese business philosophy of continuous improvement of working practices, personal efficiency, etc. It's not a moment; it's a mindset applied every single day.

Take Notes. Listen.

Back to the basics. In a digital world, simple tools are often the best mediums through which we discover innovative ways forward. Zack takes note of everything — because knowing what you don't know is as powerful as expertise itself.

Be the Guide

Transformative thinking is often impeded by existing legacy practices and budgetary constraints. The role of the UX lead is to identify the crux, and offer a wide array of viable ways forward — not to be the loudest voice, but the clearest one.

Leave It Open-Ended

A proof-of-concept should convey direction, not prescription. Understand the existing product, identify modern and proven UI patterns, produce a POC to socialize with the team — and then let the team make it better.

Innovation is Collective

Innovation stems from a collective need, not individual desire. It's through team effort — not personal hubris — that the most productive means towards fulfillment are found. The best idea wins, regardless of where it came from.

Handwritten notes — brainstorming and listening
BNY Mellon / Pershing X — Unfiltered
What the
Case Study
Doesn't Say

The polished version above documents the work. This version documents what it actually cost to do it — and what happened after.

WHO WAS ACTUALLY LEADING

The case study calls it a "UX leadership engagement delivered via Publicis Sapient." Here's what the org chart actually looked like in practice:

The official lead — a former Director of UX at the Pentagon — was clandestinely job shopping while on the project. Camera off. Ghosting standups. Unreachable.

The Program Director, referred to internally as "Coach," openly acknowledged he lacked a design or technical background. Finance knowledge only.

That left me as the de facto project lead: sole proprietor of client relationship, information gathering, and team direction for a months-long engagement with a major financial services client.

Not by title. Not by pay. By necessity — and because someone had to.

375 HUDSON. 2AM. WHITEBOARDS.

In the first weeks of the project, I spent several days and nights at the office building something the team didn't have: a complete inventory of every state and surface of a disconnected product ecosystem — formatted for team socialization, structured for handoff, usable by anyone who picked it up.

I came into 375 Hudson specifically to use the whiteboards. Mapping a system of this complexity in my head at home wasn't productive for team work. I lived down the street. It cost me nothing but sleep. I regularly stayed until 2am.

As part of that effort, I also proposed conceptual dashboard concepts — hypothetical visualizations showing a format wholly different from the dev-designed, table-based structure that existed across every product domain.

The inventory became the project's connective tissue. The dashboard concepts eventually found their way into the final product.

HR wrote me up for staying after business hours. Leadership wrote me up for "going rogue."

Six months in, a PhD-holding product lead was brought in and promoted to Director. He rejected my handoff. Removed me from all client-facing meetings. Presented the data and design work as his own. My junior and associate designers privately expressed fear of being fired. They weren't wrong to be afraid.

WHAT MY WORK PRODUCED. WHAT I RECEIVED.

My contributions directly led to a contract extension. My work directly influenced both the design systems and data UX that shipped.

I was not credited for any of it.

Let go "amicably" with 4 weeks severance.
Zero references from the leadership who hired me.
Pay was $20–40K below market rate for the role I was actually performing.

Every message I've sent since — including requests for a reference — has been ignored.

The managing group director who hired me has not responded once.

EMPTY OFFICES SAY EVERYTHING

I skateboarded to the office every day. Remote employee — chose to show up anyway. Never once saw a leadership-level person come in last year, except for a talk about the power of digital transformation.

I stayed late. HR wrote me up for it. That time was spent inventorying the client's entire product ecosystem — a foundational artifact that the project ran on.

When you have an employee who doesn't complain about organizational disorder and instead elevates their output to support their team — it might behoove you to embrace that.
WHO ACTUALLY CARRIED THE PROJECT

I was the only person on the team without a Master's degree. My juniors and associates had Masters. The incoming lead had a PhD. I have 20 years of autodidactic, hands-on, empirical experience.

It was not the PhD or Master's-holding folks who carried this project. It was due diligence. It was a genuine, wholehearted team approach that produced viable ways forward.

WHAT HAPPENED THE SAME WEEK
Let go from the project.
My mom died.
Found a stray dog in NYC. wolfie.love

People lie. I don't. I'm suffering for it. Hoping to find less of that outside the agency world.

AVAILABLE. AND I SHOW UP.

2023–2024. Before "AI" was mentioned in any conversation. Good old-fashioned due diligence and creative ambition.

I may not know all of the acronyms. I understand insanely complex systems. I bring the due diligence and charisma that your product needs.

zack.cx/bny → zack.cx/px →

WORK TO EAT. EAT TO LIVE.
LIVE TO SKATE. SKATE TO WORK.

zack.cx